RECOGNISING AND EVALUATING DUAL-USE INVENTIONS USING PATENT DATA

Authors

  • Kira Horiacheva Military Institute of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2217.2025.61.54-57

Keywords:

dual use, knowledge transfer, patents, defense, innovation

Abstract

B a c k g r o u n d . The dual use of technologies has become a pressing issue in the field of innovation, particularly in the context of military and civilian applications. Historically, military innovations have demonstrated a significant impact on economic development and technological progress in civilian sectors. Specifically, technologies originally developed for defense purposes often find a second life in everyday domains such as medicine, transportation, and communication. The objective of this study was to assess the scope and characteristics of knowledge transfer between military and civilian sectors and to identify the key factors influencing the likelihood of dual use.

M e t h o d s . The study employed several methods, including patent data analysis, semantic search, and econometric modeling. The primary data source was the PATSTAT database, which contains global information on patents filed across various countries between 2012 and 2022. Patents classified as military were identified using three criteria: inclusion in military technology categories in the International Patent Classification (IPC), patents filed by defense sector applicants, and keyword analysis of patent titles and descriptions. The sample included 1,6 000 patents, which were analyzed for citations in civilian patents. Probit models were used to estimate the probability of dual use based on patent characteristics, and survival models were employed to analyze the time to the first civilian citation.

R e s u l t s . The analysis revealed that technologies with broader application areas, such as medical devices and electrical engineering, exhibit a high level of dual use (57.7 % and 65.2 %, respectively). In contrast, traditional military fields, such as weapons and ammunition, demonstrate significantly lower levels of integration into the civilian sector (25.4 %). Geographic analysis showed that patents from the United States have the highest share of dual use (64.5 %), whereas this figure for russia was only 5 %. The average time to the first military citation was 1,302 days, while the time to the first civilian citation was 1,316 days, indicating a delay in knowledge transfer to civilian domains. Dynamic analysis also showed that the share of dual use decreased over the study period, potentially due to the increasing specialization of military technologies.

C o n c l u s i o n s . It was established that military innovations with a broader technological scope have greater potential for dual use. Such innovations are more likely to be applied in the civilian sector, particularly in high-tech industries, whereas narrowly specialized military technologies exhibit limited knowledge transfer. Geographic analysis confirmed the importance of national innovation policies: countries with integrated innovation systems demonstrate higher knowledge transfer efficiency. These findings underscore the need to develop strategies aimed at increasing the adaptability of military technologies and expanding international collaboration to enhance dual use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acosta, M., Coronado, D., & Flores, E. (2013). Science and technology parks and their role in knowledge transfer in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(6), 1171–1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.11.017

Bresnahan, T. F., & Trajtenberg, M. (1995). General purpose technologies: 'Engines of growth'? Journal of Econometrics, 65(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01598-T

Bukkvoll, T., Malmlöf, T., & Makienko, A. (2017). The defence industry as a locomotive for technological renewal in Russia: Are there any limits? PostCommunist Economies, 29(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2016.1267961

Martí Sempere, C. (2018). What is known about defence research and development spill-overs? Defence and Peace Economics, 29(3), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2016.1267357

Molas-Gallart, J. (1997). Which way to go? Defence technology and the diversity of 'dual-use' technology transfer. Research Policy, 26(3), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00023-1

Morales-Ramos, E. (2002). Defence R&D expenditure: The crowding-out hypothesis. Defence and Peace Economics, 13(5), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242690212373

Mowery, D. C., & Langlois, R. N. (1996). Spinning off and spinning on(?): The federal government role in the development of the US computer software industry. Research Policy, 25(6), 947–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(96)00884-7

Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., & Martin, B. R. (2010). Technology policy and global warming: Why new policy models are needed (or why putting new wine in old bottles won't work). Research Policy, 39(8), 1011–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.008

Oltmann, S. M. (2015). Variables related to school media center LGBT collections. Libri, 65(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2014-0069

Ruttan, V. W. (2006). Is war necessary for economic growth? Military procurement and technology development. Oxford University Press.

Schmid, G. (2018). The transfer of military technologies to the civilian sector: An analysis of the dual-use potential of defence research and development. Defence and Peace Economics, 29(4), 386–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2016.1267358

Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007

Watkins, A. (1990). Science and innovation in the defense industry: The role of the military in the development of high technology. Defense Economics, 1(3), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10430719008404610

Published

2025-03-27

Issue

Section

Law

How to Cite

Horiacheva, K. (2025). RECOGNISING AND EVALUATING DUAL-USE INVENTIONS USING PATENT DATA. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Military-Special Sciences, 1(61), 54-57. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2217.2025.61.54-57