PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS IN THE ADAPTATION OF TRAINEES TO A SIMULATION-BASED LEARNING ENVIRONMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2217.2025.62.32-38Keywords:
adaptation process; internal and external factors; simulation equipment; manipulations; adaptive activity; trainees; task performance efficiency; individual psychological traitsAbstract
B a c k g r o u n d . The adaptation process involves the simultaneous and multidirectional influence of a range of both subjective and objective factors. One of the objective indicators of successful adaptation is the accurate execution of assigned tasks. Accordingly, this study includes an evaluation of the effectiveness of manipulations performed with simulation equipment.
M e t h o d s . The study employed: an author's questionnaire for in-depth assessment of attitudes toward training in a simulation environment and interpersonal relationships within this context; the "Dominant State" methodology; the Multilevel Personality Questionnaire "Adaptability"; the Big Five Personality Inventory "BIG 5"; the KON-2006 Questionnaire; the Achievement Motivation Test and the "Motivation to Avoid Failure" Questionnaire.
R e s u l t s . The study identified several distinctive features in how trainees perceive simulation-based training. The primary factor influencing this perception is the practical experience they acquire. Trainees recognise its significance and acknowledge its critical role in mastering training in a simulated setting. The second most prominent factor relates to the characteristics of the specific simulation equipment. This suggests that modifications to the system of interaction with instructors could further unlock the potential of simulation-based training. Trainees emphasise the need to adapt and improve engagement with instructors to optimise learning opportunities. The third factor concerns the constraints and nuances of interaction with the simulator itself. The possibilities and limitations associated with the use of simulators can significantly affect both the perception and effectiveness of training within the simulated environment.
C o n c l u s i o n s . Based on the results of thematic analysis, five thematic domains were identified, reflecting key aspects of cognitive and mental representation of training in a simulation-based environment: physical (technical), psychological, and social components, as well as both positive and negative attitudes. Taking into account the findings – which allowed for the identification of specific stressors associated with simulationbased learning – a multidimensional follow-up study on the adaptation process is planned, along with the development of a psychological support system for trainees.
Downloads
References
Au, M. L., Sao, L. M., Cheong, W., Wang, S. Ch., & Van, I. K. (2016). Nursing students' perception of high-fidelity simulation activity instead of clinical placement: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 39, 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.01.015
Bezlutska, O. (2017). Psychological aspects of training cadets of Kherson State Maritime Academy to work in extreme conditions. Traektoriâ Nauki. Science International Electronic Scientific Journal, 3, 2, 1.7–1.11 [in Ukrainian]. https://pathofscience.org/index.php/ps/article/view/287
Crytzer, M. L. (2011). The effect of high-fidelity home health simulations on nursing students' clinical performance [Doctoral dissertation, Loyola University].
Furman, A. V. (2000). Psychodiagnostics of personal adaptability: a scientific publication. Ekonomichna Dumka [in Ukrainian]
Gerganov, L. D. (2013). Training and practical training of students and crew specialists in maritime educational institutions of Ukraine as a tool for navigation safety. Water Transport, 1, 114-118 [in Ukrainian].
Harris, S. R., Kemmerling, R. L., & North, M. M. (2002). Brief Virtual Reality Therapy for Public Speaking Anxiety. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 5(6), 543–550.
Kokun, O. M. (2004). Optimisation of human adaptive capabilities in the psychophysiological support of activity [Doctoral dissertation, Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of the Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine] [in Ukrainian].
Korolchuk, V. M. (2011). Coping features of adaptive resources of personality stress resistance. Bulletin of the National Defence University of Ukraine, 1, 164-171 [in Ukrainian].
Kuzikova, S. B., & Shcherbak, T. I. (2023). Resilience as an adaptive resource of personality in the reality of life uncertainty. Slobozhanskyi naukovyi vestnik. Series: Psychology, 2, 24–29 [in Ukrainian]. https://journals.spu.sumy.ua/index.php/psy/issue/view/8/8
Lefterov, V. O. (2010). Psychological aspects of the problem of cadets' adaptation to the educational space [in Ukrainian]. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vnadps_2010_4_23
Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal Of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3, 1–33.
McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Cohen, E. R., Barsuk, J. H., & Wayne, D. B. (2011). Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A metaanalytic comparative review of the evidence. Academic medicine, 86, 6, 706–711. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217e119
Pavlushenko, V. M. (2001). Specificity of the process of adaptation of military university students to pro-professional activity. Collection of scientific works, 18, part II, 292–296. NAPWU [in Ukrainian].
Pike, T., & O'Donnell, V. (2010). The impact of clinical simulation on learner self-efficacy in pre-registration nursing education. Nurse education today, 30, 5, 405–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.09.013
Rudov, B. A. (2002). Adaptation of junior cadets to studying in a higher military educational institution [Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences dissertation, Khmelnytskyi] [in Ukrainian].
Xu, H., & Liu, F. (2017). Measuring the Efficiency of Education and Technology via DEA approach: Implications on National Development. Social Science, 6(4), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6040136
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Oksana Kravchenko, Oleksandr Safin, Nataliia Mas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





