PSYCHOLOGY OF THE SERVICEMAN'S LIFE AFTER CAPTIVITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2217.2022.50.54-59Keywords:
prisoner of war, behavior, release from captivity, psyche of a prisoner of war, undesired memories, social intelligence, adaptation to freedomAbstract
Among all types of severe challenges, that servicemen have to face during war, captivity is experienced differently. By significantly undermining serviceman's health, narrowing his future prospects, injuring his psyche and leading to a severe mental, moral crisis, captivity dramatically changes the life of an individual. After supervising long-term reintegration and post-isolation support of people released from captivity, the author of the article reveals the peculiarities of readaptation and mental state of servicemen in the first four to five weeks, after being released from the captivity. It was found out, that the mere fact of a soldier's physical return to a peaceful environment does not signify his return to the usual way of living, which he had before the captivity. Particular attention is paid to the course of interpersonal conflict, undesired memories, which involuntarily activate the memory mechanisms of the former prisoners of war, subsequently generating and leading to re-traumatization. The article reveals the peculiarities of the family members' interaction with the personality of a former prisoner of war. In this context, it is highlighted how servicemen with different adaptive potential and individual-typological characteristics reintegrate into the society. The specifics of serviceman's behavior, whose actions in the mass media spotlight were outlined. For the first time, the interconnection between social intelligence and the three constitutional personality types of servicemen (endomorph, mesomorph and ectomorph) had been proven, which made it possible to determine the extent to which this relationship is the key to the effective adaptation to peaceful life of freed prisoners.
Downloads
References
1. Military psychology and pedagogy: an innovative approach: a textbook in 2 parts Part 1. (2012). Kyiv: NUOU. P. 329-338 [in Ukrainian].
2. Frankl W. (2022). Man in search of true meaning. Psychologist in a concentration camp. Kharkiv: Family Leisure Club. 159 p. [in Ukrainian].
3. Shyrobokov Ju. M. (2020). Teoretical and practical aspects of the military captivity psychology: monograph. Kharkiv: CLO V SPRAVI. 476 p. [in Ukrainian].
4. Hoffmann E. (2018). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York. 752 p. [in English].
5. Bettelheim B. (1943). Individual and Mass Behavior in Extreme Situations. In: Abnorm. Psychol. Albany 38. P. 432. [in English].
6. Cohen E. A. (1954). Human Behavior in the Concentration Camp. London. P. 137. [in English].
7. Kral V. A. (1951). Psychiatric Observations under Severe Chronis Stress. In: Amer. J. Psychiat. 108. P. 185. [in English].
8. Nardini J. E. (1952). Survival Factor in American Prisoners of War of the Japanese. In: Amer. J. Psychiat. 109. P. 242. [in English].
9. Helweg-Larset P., Hoffmeyer H., Kieler J., Hess-Thaysen E., HertelWulff M. (1952). Famine Disease in German Concentration Camps ets. Kopenhagen. P. 154.
10. Apalkov Vitalii. (2021). Black hole of captivity in the Universe of war. Scientific journal of Polonia university periodyk naykovy akademii polonijnej. V. 44, nr. 1. P. 9–16.
11. Aseyev S. (2020). The bright way. The story of one concentration camp. Lviv: Staryi Lev Publishing House. 448 p. [in Ukrainian].
12. Khmiliar O. F. (2017). Psychology of serviceman's behavior in captivity. Application of the Land Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in modern conflicts: materials of scientific practice. 1. conf., November 16, 2017. Lviv: National Academy of Land Forces named after Hetman Petro Sagaidachny. P. 132–133. [in Ukrainian].
13. Gracens E. (2021). Sustainability: hard-won wisdom for a better life. Kharkiv: Fabula. 432 p. [in Ukrainian].
14. Glukhovsky V.S. (2008). My memories. Kyiv: Osnova. 152 p.
15. Edwin E. Dwinger (2004). Army behind barbed wire. Diary of a German prisoner of war in Russia 1915–1918 Moscow.: CJSC "Tsentrpoligraf". 350 p. [in Russian].
16. Goyzenga Johann (2019). The man is playing. Kyiv: Azbuka-Attikus. 400 p.
17. Reintegration and post-isolation support of persons released from forced isolation: features of work in the conditions of hybrid aggression. Analytical report on the results of work with persons released from forced isolation on December 27, 2017 and January 24, 2018 (updated). Kyiv, 2018. 166 p. [in Ukrainian].
18. Zimbardo F. (2019). The effect of Lucifer. Why good people do evil. The 3rd type. Kyiv: Yakaboo Publishing. 592 p. [in Ukrainian].
19. Fromm E. (2019). Man for himself. Psychoanalysis and ethics. Kyiv: Yakaboo Publishing. P. 34–55. [in Ukrainian].
20. Sheldon W. (1982). Analysis of constitutional differences in biographical data. Psychology of individual differences. Texts. p. 252-261.
21. Khmiliar O. F. (2016). Psychology of symbolic regulation of actions and deeds of personality: a monograph. Kyiv: Context Ukraine LLC. 380 p. [in Ukrainian].
22. Krasnytska O. V. (2022). Deprivation of servicemen who perform tasks in isolation from the main forces, and in conditions of captivity. Bulletin of the National University of Defense of Ukraine. № 2 (66). p. 50-63. [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 O. Khmiliar, V. Apalkov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





