THE PROBLEM OF FOSSILIZED ERRORS AND THEIR CORRECTING DURINGA FOUR-MONTH INTENSIVE ENGLISH LANGUAGE COURSE (ALC – AMERICAN LANGUAGE COURSE)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2217.2026.66.26-30Keywords:
fossilized errors, English language acquisition, intensive learning, teaching strategies, overcoming errors and mistakesAbstract
Background. Fossilized errors remain a persistent and widely discussed problem in the process of foreign language acquisition, particularly among learners attending intensive English language courses. Such errors tend to become fixed over time and resist correction even after repeated exposure to correct language forms. As a result, they hinder the development of communicative competence and negatively affect further language development, especially at intermediate and advanced levels. The problem becomes more complicated under conditions of intensive instruction, where a large volume of learning material and limited time for reflection may contribute to the reinforcement of incorrect language forms. Despite the considerable amount of theoretical research devoted to the phenomenon of fossilization, there remains a need for practice-oriented approaches aimed at effective error correction in real educational settings. The aim of the study is to identify effective methods and techniques for correcting fossilized and semi-fossilized errors under conditions of intensive foreign language learning instruction.
Methods. The study is based on the observation of the educational process and the experimental application of error correction strategies during a four-month intensive English language course (ALC – American Language Course). Fossilized and semi-fossilized errors were identified, classified, and analysed. Various correction techniques were systematically implemented and evaluated, including self-correction, peer correction, and teacher-guided feedback, and teacher-assisted correction.
Results. The findings indicate that the systematic and purposeful application of correction strategies significantly contributes to reducing the number of fossilized errors. The combination of different correction methods proved to be more effective than the use of isolated approaches. Continuous feedback, repeated practice of problematic language forms, and active learner involvement were identified as key factors in successful error correction.
Conclusions. Systematic and consistent work on fossilized errors contributes to the improvement of learners' communicative competence and ensures more effective foreign language acquisition under conditions of intensive instruction.
Downloads
References
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.
Corder, Pit. (1967). the significance of learner's errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 161–170.
Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning teaching: A guidebook for English language teachers (2nd ed.). Macmillan.
Harmer, J. (2015). The practice of English language teaching (5th ed.). Pearson.
Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon.
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage, IRAL. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10, 3. https://www.academia.edu/21533333/Selinker_Interlanguage
Larsen-Freeman, Diane, & Cameron, Lynne. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00793_5.x
Syafuri, Tania, Saputra, Andri. (2021). The first language interference toward students' English speaking as foreign language. http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ling.v7i1.4150
Shirley Thalia Daquilema Chorlango, Paulina Alexandra Arias Arroyo. (2024). Morphosyntactic errors in learning English as a foreign language: The context of university students. https://doi.org/10.33422/ejte.v3i4.549
Hani Hamad M. Albelihi, Arif Al-Ahdal. (2024). Overcoming error fossilization in academic writing: strategies for Saudi EFL learners to move beyond the plateau. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00303-y
Berwick, Robert C., Chomsky, N. (2016). Why only us? Language and evolution. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262034241.001.0001
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Olha Korzhova, Valentyn Zlatnikov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.











